Open Source Sermon (Wednesday, September 9)

09 Sep

When we ask the question, “Why is forgiveness so hard for God?” what we are really asking is, “What does it take to be in a right relationship with God?” In other words, we are struggling to understand the meaning of the atonement. The generic meaning of “atonement” is “the reparation for an offense or injury.”

The idea of the atonement is found in so many Scripture passages. For example: 1 John 2.2, Colossians 1.19-23, Romans 5.9-10, Romans 3.21-26, and most briefly in Ephesians 2 where the apostle Paul writes,

But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near through the blood of Jesus (Ephesians 2.13).

Atonement: the bringing near to God those who once were far away. But as we think deeply about this idea, we are forced to wrestle with some serious theological implications.

For instance, If  God is very holy, righteous and demanding, then humans will not be able to satisfy God easily and something will have to be done on their behalf. But, if God is indulgent and permissive, then it might be sufficient to give humans a little encouragement and instruction.

If mankind is basically spiritual intact, he or she can, with a bit of effort, probably fulfill what God wants of him or her. In that case, a little instruction, inspiration, and motivation may be the essence of the atonement. But, if mankind is totally depraved and unable to do what is right not matter how much she or he wishes or tries, then a more radical work will have to be done on his or her behalf.

The questions are: (1) what is the real problem, and (2) what steps must be done to correct the problem?

There have been five major theories of the atonement that have been advocated within the Christian church. I will share two with you today and three tomorrow.

1. Atonement as Example: This theory rejects any idea of vicarious suffering (the idea that Christ suffered on our behalf). Instead, the death of Christ effected universal forgiveness. More importantly, the death of Jesus provided a perfect example which epitomizes this type of dedication which we are to practice. The primary verse for this theory is 1 Peter 2.21-22, “To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example that you should follow in his steps.” According to this theory, all that was needed for God and mankind to have fellowship is that mankind have faith in and love for God. For God to have required something more would have been contrary to His nature. God and mankind are restored to their intended relationships by our personal adoption of both the teachings of Jesus and the example he set in life and especially in death. In this theory, mankind is morally capable of doing God’s will, and God’s wrath towards sin has been easily satisfied.

2. Moral Influence Theory: In this theory, Jesus did not make some sort of sacrificial payment to the Father to satisfy His wrath. Instead, Jesus demonstrated to mankind the full extent of the love of God for humanity.The real problem to be solved was mankind’s fear and ignorance of God. Christ’s death enabled mankind to be open to the love of God, to respond to that love by drawing near to Him, and to be inspired by that love to live in a trusting, obedient relationship with God.

As we evaluate these theories, and consider the three theories tomorrow, the primary question to ask is “to whom did the work of Christ on the cross effect, God or mankind?”

What do you think about these two theories? Do they adequate explain what happened on the cross in light of Hebrews 9.22, “without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness”?


Posted by on September 9, 2009 in Uncategorized


2 responses to “Open Source Sermon (Wednesday, September 9)

  1. Brian Mattson

    September 9, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    ahhh….the views on the atonement. These are wonderful topics. I’m not so sure that it is possible to pick just one view on the atonement. I think that it may be possible to hold several of the views in tandem. If the definition of the atonement is ‘bringing near to God those who were once far away from God,’ then we need to break down the definition. First, using the pronoun ‘those’ assumes people are the only benefactors of the atonement. It is understood that Scripture teaches the idea of a totally depraved humanity. The Scriptures also teach that because of our first parents’ sin the creation was cursed. All of creation, not just humanity, is far from God and in need of atonement. Moral Influence and the Jesus Exemplar models tends to focus on the effect of Jesus’ actions upon the persons actions. It is true that humanity’s actions need atoning. Penal Substitution also focuses on the individual but its aim is a judicial declaration of righteousness. This is also in the realm of morality and ethics. There is a fourth view, the Christus Victor understanding of the atonement that seems to address both the individual and the systemic issues of evil. It is not enough that Jesus died for the sin(s) of humanity and modeled for humanity a correct way of living (i.e. putting others before self) but Jesus needed to take care of the problem of sin itself which is evil. In order for the penal substitutionary, moral influence and exemplar model to ‘work’ there is needed a Christus Victor understanding whereby Christ disarms the principalities and powers (evil) of this dark age. All this to say, we need all the views of the atonement not just one.

  2. tpylant

    September 9, 2009 at 2:58 pm

    Brian, I love it when you stop by because you challenge my thinking. I think you are right about holding all the views in tandem for they each have a part of the truth.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: